tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5806675619086234893.post5334927171556768438..comments2017-05-05T00:37:57.673-07:00Comments on Taking Yourself Seriously: Failurespodsheffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03823546659514847188noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5806675619086234893.post-2826267506579433692017-01-16T06:30:08.598-08:002017-01-16T06:30:08.598-08:00I like this but it makes me nervous. I think one t...I like this but it makes me nervous. I think one thing we could all do is to read the artists legacy chapter in Keri's book.<br />I will send it round. Kate Pahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14025228318022336961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5806675619086234893.post-91510655820930560102017-01-16T02:02:07.667-08:002017-01-16T02:02:07.667-08:00When Kate was distracted at the meeting I explaine...When Kate was distracted at the meeting I explained to Andrew that the project was a bit like an episode of the Killing. Not that it was about serial killers but more the idea that the script for the project evolved from episode to episode. The characters and structure are there but nobody has a clue whats going to happen. I think the TV series of Twin Peaks was made a bit like this - the owls were not what they seemed but we never got to know what they actually were as nobody Knew. I think this approach takes on the potential of failures as when you set off you don't know what success looks like, for most of us this openness in the days of full accountability KPI's and REF's audits and scrutiny committees is unusual and difficult to know what to do with so we try to back peddler talk of outcomes and outputs and say things like " We need to speak to policy" but policies like the owls in twin peaks are not what they seem. spodsheffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03823546659514847188noreply@blogger.com